Sunday, May 1, 2011

A year on, Gulf still grapples with BP oil spill


A worker takes soil samples of an island in Barataria Bay to determine if the island needs to be cleaned again near Myrtle Grove, Louisiana, March 31, 2011.
Credit: REUTERS/Sean Gardner
VENICE, La./WAVELAND, Mississippi | Tue Apr 19, 2011 6:26am EDT
(Reuters) - When a BP oil rig exploded and sank in the Gulf of Mexico last April, killing 11 workers, authorities first reported that no crude was leaking into the ocean.
They were wrong.
The disaster that captivated the world's attention for 153 days struck at 9:53 p.m. CDT on April 20, when a surge of methane gas known to rig hands as a "kick" sparked an explosion aboard the Deepwater Horizon rig as it was drilling the mile-deep Macondo 252 well off Louisiana's coast. Two days later, the rig sank.
One year on, oil from the largest spill in U.S. history clogs wetlands, pollutes the ocean and endangers wildlife, not to mention the toll it has inflicted on the coastal economies of Florida, Mississippi, Alabama and especially Louisiana.
It was the biggest ever accidental release of oil into an ocean.
Even so, environmental damage from the ruptured well that spewed more than 4 million barrels of oil (168 million gallons) into the Gulf in three months seems far less dire than the worst predictions, according to some Gulf residents and experts.
"It's a horrible mess but it's not the end of the world," said Edward Overton, professor emeritus of environmental sciences at Louisiana State University in Baton Rouge.
"Some people thought it would be the end of the Gulf for decades and that's not even near the case," Overton said. "None of those predictions were right."
Such considerations are cold comfort to Gulf residents who saw their livelihoods decimated by the spill. More than 500,000 have claimed compensation from a $20 billion fund set up by BP -- at the insistence of President Barack Obama -- and administered by Kenneth Feinberg.
The mitigated view will also do little to stem the tide of litigation that will take years to make its way through federal court in New Orleans and beyond as plaintiffs seek to extract damages from London-based BP, which owned the Macondo well, and Swiss-based Transocean, which owned the rig.
"Fishermen are still worried that there's oil on the bottom of the Gulf. But we've got no control over that," said Errol Voisin, manager of the Lafitte Frozen Foods plant in Louisiana, who spoke ahead of a new shrimping season.
"INSULT TO INJURY"
The National Wildlife Federation paints a picture of an ocean ecology mauled by the spill and facing a long road to recovery. Thousands of birds and other wildlife died.
Sea turtles were hit hard. The western population of the bluefin tuna, which breeds only in the northern Gulf, was breeding just as oil spewed from the ocean floor. Contamination may have reduced juvenile tuna production by 20 percent.
In many cases, the slick compounded factors that already threatened the environment. Wetlands, for example, act as a natural barrier against storm surges but for decades oil industry penetration and other factors have eroded them.
Few places illustrate the damage more poignantly than Bay Jimmy, a breeding ground for shrimp, fish and oysters nestled in a labyrinth of waterways south of New Orleans.
Marshland around the bay still bears scars from the oil spill, with some areas ringed by dead grasses. Oil oozes from the ground just as it did last summer.
"When the oil hit, it was like adding insult to injury .... The concern for us is in terms of habitat for the wildlife," said Maura Wood, NWF's senior outreach coordinator.
Yet for all that, assessing the spill's impact presents a puzzle, experts say. Two examples illustrate the challenge.
"OUT OF SIGHT, OUT OF MIND"?
This year, 153 bottle-nosed dolphin carcasses have washed up on Gulf coasts: 65 of those were infants: new born, stillborn or born prematurely, according to figures from the U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA).
The dolphins were conceived at the time of the spill, said Moby Solangi, president of the Institute for Marine Mammal Studies in Gulfport, Mississippi.
To determine the cause of death requires a necropsy, which Solangi can perform at the institute, as well as toxicological and other forms of analysis.
But in February the government halted all external investigations into dolphin deaths and turned the matter over to NOAA, which is yet to release any findings.
"It is frustrating to any scientist. Certainly we want to get results," Solangi said in an interview.
For Samantha Joye, a marine sciences professor at the University of Georgia, the problem is the slow pace of research into exactly how oil affected the ocean.
Joye first identified so-called undersea 'oil plumes' during the spill and has since found evidence, such as crabs behaving sluggishly that seems to point to damage to the ocean floor. But she acknowledges more work needs to be done.
"I would like to be able to make conclusive statements about the health of the Gulf of Mexico but I can't because there's a lot we don't know," Joye said in an interview.
"There seems to be this 'If we can't see it, it's not going to hurt us' mentality. There's no oil on the surface therefore the problem is solved. That's just not true," she said.
CONFLICTING VIEWS ON ECONOMIC TOLL
One corporate casualty of the spill was BP Chief Executive Tony Hayward, who lost his job last July in a storm of criticism over perceived insensitivity to Gulf coast residents. He was replaced by Bob Dudley.
The oil giant says it has spent over $16 billion on redress and restoration projects, with total spending estimated at $40.9 billion.
BP chairman Carl-Henric Svanberg told shareholders on Thursday the company's response to the spill "was without precedent, and I think, has been recognized as such."
Protesters against the spill, some from the United States, demonstrated at BP's annual shareholder meeting in London.
The disaster wiped about $70 billion from BP's market value, knocking its share price down from $61 a few days before the explosion to $26.75 in late June. The stock has recovered to close Thursday at $45.54 a share.
BP at least is upbeat about the Gulf's recovery.
"We are absolutely confident that the water is safe. The residents and tourists are telling us that the beaches have never looked better, the seafood is safe and delicious and I hear fishing is excellent right now as well," Mike Utsler, chief operating officer of BP's Gulf Coast Restoration Organization wrote in Facebook comments published this week.
But there are no clear overall estimates of economic damage from the slick as it ripped through sectors as diverse as fishing, tourism, municipal finance, real estate, banking and services.
In fact, there are almost as many conflicting views of the economic toll as there are stakeholders on the coast.
Tom Becker, president of the Charter Boat Captain's Association of Mississippi, said his business was down at least 50 percent because of a perception among potential clients that Gulf waters remain unsafe.
Rene Cross, owner of the Cypress Cove Marina in Venice, Louisiana, canceled his Cajun Canyons Billfish Classic deep sea fishing tournament last year as the government closed Gulf waters to fishing. But he is restarting the event this spring.
"We are getting reports of marlin getting caught, some nice fish. That's a positive sign for us," Cross said.
Many Gulf fishermen said they were waiting for full compensation from fund administrator Feinberg, a financial and psychological hardship among coastal residents who pride themselves on fierce independence.
Darlene Kimball, an oyster buyer at Pass Christian's harbor in Mississippi, opened her receipt books to show that this time last year she was buying up to 1,500 sacks of oysters a day. Last week that figure was down to 47 on some days.
When officials inspected the offshore beds, they found large numbers of dead oysters, so they did not do the dredging necessary for the new season.
Experts are yet to identify the cause of those deaths, though tests show live oysters are clean and Gulf seafood is now the most heavily tested in the world, residents said.
"I can't say for sure what killed the oysters because I'm no marine biologist. But what happened? They (the oysters) were there on April 20. We have not gotten paid (by Feinberg) and our business is nowhere near back to normal, Kimball said. "It's not fair. We didn't ask for this spill."
(Additional reporting by Verna Gates in Birmingham, Leigh Coleman in Biloxi, Pascal Fletcher in Miami and Chris Baltimore in Houston, writing by Matthew Bigg; Editing by Philip Barbara)

EScaribbean is now on YouTube

EScaribbean.com has  joined the exciting and informative world of YouTube.
We will be adding videos of projects, as well as finding  the best environmental videos out there to share with you.
Won't you please join us http://www.youtube.com/user/ESCprojects

Saturday, April 30, 2011

Green leaders spell out vision for next 50 years

Zurich, April 29th 2011 - A summit of environmental leaders and politicians has called for an urgent move towards a global green economy in order to achieve sustainable development over the next half century.

Low-carbon technology, green infrastructures, investment in renewable energy and sustainable agriculture were all listed as being essential in combating climate change, poverty and water shortages.

Speaking at the event today, convened by WWF to mark the global conservation organization's 50th anniversary, EU Environment Commissioner Janez Potočnik said that unless biodiversity is adequately protected the consequences would be "catastrophic".

"Biodiversity and ecosystem services must be protected, valued and adequately restored," said Commissioner Potočnik. "It's essential for human well-being and in our own self-interest. If we do not preserve ecosystems we will push biodiversity over the tipping point beyond which changes become irreversible and possibly even catastrophic. It is an irrefutable fact that global consumption and use of resources is the biggest factor in a sustainable future."

The specially-convened roundtable - "Public Sector Voices on Conservation in the next Half-Century" brought Mr Potočnik together with leaders from Asia and Europe to set out their vision of the state of the planet in 50 years' time. WWF International President Yolanda Kakabadse, chairing the debate in Zurich, told the audience "We are here to celebrate 50 years of WWF - but we want to look forward, not back. What is the next half century going to bring in terms of water, food and life on earth?"

Bhutan's Minister of Agriculture and Forests, Dr. Pema Gyamtsho pledged that within ten years, as part of its drive towards sustainability, Bhutan would be the world's first totally organic country. He said water security was the biggest challenge facing his country - but one which could only be solved through global action.

"What happens in the Himalayas and South Asia is going to impact all of us. Can we afford to wait until 2050 to limit temperature rises to two degrees celsius? Two degrees will be too much and 2050 will be too late." said Dr. Gyamtsho. "We need to act now - many areas are already suffering shortage of drinking water."

The Norwegian Minister of the Environment, Erik Solheim spoke of the urgent need to put real economic value on ecosystems and natural resources to help stop widespread deforestation.

"We must come to a situation where there is an economic benefit for the sustainable use and conservation of natural resources," said Mr Solheim.

"The big success story is Brazil where deforestation has been reduced by 70% in seven years - by far the biggest factor in fighting climate change. NGOs must encourage governments to take risks and support those politicians who do do something."

There was a warning that any proposed global green investment fund to fight climate change should not attempt to replace or duplicate existing environmental and development finance.
"Today there are more than 230 overseas development funds which lead to fragmentation and more overheads," said Monique Barbut, CEO of the Global Environment Facility.
"We should not be trying to build again another poorly coordinated system which is not going to work. I do not believe we need a new institution or a new bureaucracy."

All panellists were unanimous in congratulating WWF for its record of conservation achievements for the past 50 years. Commissioner Potočnik said "Congratulations are due to WWF on the splendid results of the last fifty years and for playing an excellent role in the preservation of the environment."

Monique Barbut added "WWF has played a very important role in promoting policy and science."

Rounding off the debate, WWF International Director General Jim Leape urged NGOs to move beyond their traditional roles of lobbying and asking for money.

"We are uniquely placed to help in forging coalitions of the committed to address the biggest issues of our time," said Mr Leape. "By working in partnership with government we have already achieved some great results."


From WWF news

Friday, April 29, 2011

Want to protect the ocean? Start by stopping runoff and erosion



Did you know that 80% of pollution to the marine environment comes from land-based sources, such as runoff pollution?

Millions of motor vehicle engines make daily, one-drop-at-a-time "oil spills" onto roads and parking lots, which add significantly to runoff pollution.

Some water pollution actually starts as air pollution, which settles into waterways and oceans. Dirt can be a pollutant. Top soil or silt from fields or construction sites can run off into waterways, harming fish and wildlife habitats.

Non-point source pollution, commonly called runoff pollution, can make river and ocean water unsafe for humans and wildlife. In some areas, runoff pollution is so bad that it causes beaches to be closed after rainstorms.

Drinking water supplies can be contaminated by polluted runoff, as can coastal waters containing valuable fish stocks. Experts think there is a link between agricultural runoff and water-borne organisms that cause lesions and death in fish. Humans who come in contact with these polluted waters and affected fish can also experience harmful symptoms.

Correcting the harmful effects of runoff pollution is costly. Each year millions of dollars are spent to restore and protect areas damaged or endangered by non-point source pollutants.

A smarter way to act? Prevent runoff before it happens!


Elemetal Solutionsm using Midwest’s soil stabilization and soil erosion control products can eliminate up to 98% of erosion problems at the source, whereas mechanical methods may only be 50% effective. Our soil stabilization and soil erosion control products are specifically formulated for unpaved roadways, shoulders, paths, trails, slopes, construction sites and indoor and outdoor arenas.

Soil stabilization and erosion control are more effective than sediment control not only in reducing sediment pollution but also in reducing cost. When soil stabilization and erosion control are affected at the source, sediment never becomes entrained as it will with mechanical methods such as silt fences, hay bales, or retention ponds.

Contact us if you want to know more about ways to control runoff…

www.EScaribbean.com

info@EScaribbean.com

Wednesday, April 27, 2011

“Clouds of Dust” are for Movies, Not Your Riding Arenas


It’s a fact of life – dust happens! If you’re lucky enough to have an riding arena, you should manage and control dust to protect the health of your livestock and your riders...

Riding arena dust control eliminates problems ranging from compromised equine and human health to reduced visibility to complaints about dust from nearby communities to deterioration of arena bases. Those relying exclusively on water for riding-arena maintenance know that supplies can be scarce and prohibitive and that ongoing watering requires considerable manpower. Further, PM10 and PM2.5 emissions are dangerous to both health and safety, and the absence of effective arena dust control can negatively affect business.

If you have any dust problem in your arena, don't hesitate to give us call and we'll find a solution that is:

  • Is proven and certified environmentally-safe
  • Helps equine workers, athletes and the magnificent animals they ride attain peak health and performance
  • Reduces dust, watering, manpower, and the need for repair and reconstruction of arena bases
  • Keeps you in compliance with the PM10 and PM2.5 requirements of the Clean Air Act
  • Will not contaminate ground water with volatile organic compounds, semi-volatiles or heavy metals
  • Will not increase BOD or COD levels.

Tuesday, April 26, 2011

Create Underwater Life



The post today will be about creating underwater life with design artificial reefs, Reef Balls










A Reef Ball is actually not a 'ball' but a hemispherical hollow concrete unit invented over 15 years ago in the US. Marine life can take advantage of the hollow interior via holes and the size and number of holes can easily be varied depending upon the reefs application.
Its design has evolved over many years of trials, fine tuning and input from engineers and scientists. The result is a unit that has been proven to function as well as or better than a natural reef, therefore no matter what your application, you can be confident it will achieve maximum possible success.
Reef Ball with natural growth on it.

Key features of Reef Balls include:

  • Aesthetically pleasing – in a very short period they take on a natural rock/bommie appearance;

  • Highly stable – they have been specifically engineered to stay upright and withstand waves and currents;

  • Durable in the marine environment – the marine concrete mix is engineered for several hundred years in seawater;

  • pH adjusted surface – a special concrete mix and construction technique is used to ensure rapid colonisation;

  • Maximum productivity – the dome shape, holes, internal void and rough texture mimic natural reefs and maximise species richness;
  • Carbon offsets - CO2e emissions from the manufacture of concrete and RBA staff air travel are offsite via My Clean Sky accredited carbon credits.


Freshwater and marine habitats can be enhanced by the addition of Reef Balls including existing artificial reefs such as ships, breakwaters and jetties.

Environmental offsets - research has shown that Reef Ball reefs can attract and support the same or greater diversity and abundance of species as nearby natural reefs. Therefore a carefully designed reef using Reef Balls is a viable option for offsetting environmental impacts.


Reef Balls can be used for a range of fishery applications including the establishment of productive reef in barren or degraded areas, or as a deterrent to trawling in order to protect specific areas. Reefs can also be designed to attract target species.


Do you want to help create marine life, to enhance your waterfront property? Contact us!



Thursday, March 24, 2011

Shallow Gulf well is source of mysterious oil sheen near Grand Isle, state official says

A large sheen of oil that has confounded the Coast Guard and state officials for days has been traced to a well-capping accident about 20 miles southwest of Southwest Pass, a state official said.
View full size
map-oil-032311.jpgMeanwhile, environmentalists reported new, unconfirmed sightings Tuesday of what appeared to be surface oil over several miles in Chandeleur Sound, all the way on the other side of the Mississippi River's delta.
A state official, speaking on condition of anonymity because of a continuing Coast Guard investigation, said the Department of Wildlife and Fisheries traced the emulsified oil on the west side of the river to its apparent source at West Delta Block 117. He said tests by a state-contracted lab confirmed that was the source of the oil.
Three discharges of oil from Anglo-Suisse Offshore Partners' Platform E facility were reported to the Coast Guard, records show. The first came Friday, with a report of a "downed platform" and half a gallon of spilled crude during operations to plug and abandon the well.
Another report Sunday said the same incident had spilled 1.33 gallons of oil. A third report on Monday of 1.89 gallons of spilled oil was classified by the Coast Guard as "operator error."
Late Tuesday night, Houston-based Anglo-Suisse issued a statement acknowledging that the Coast Guard believes it may be responsible for the spill and accepting responsibility for cleanup. Anglo-Suisse said it was surprised because the well is "non-producing and has been monitored closely for the last six months." The company said it had reconnected the wellhead structure Tuesday morning and fully shut it in by 8:30 p.m.
The company said it was the 12th well in the area to undergo plugging and abandonment operations. Crews have been monitoring the site since September and didn't report any oil discharge until the end of last week.
Wildlife and Fisheries officials found the source of the oil Monday evening and encountered workers in a boat trying to restore a cap on the well using a remotely operated submarine.
"Well-capping went out of control," the state official said.
The well in question is in shallow water, about 210 feet deep, but the specter of any well-capping accident comes at the worst possible time for federal regulators, who have just approved the first four deepwater drilling projects since last spring's BP oil disaster -- mostly predicated on the oil companies' assurances that they can now cap their wells quickly in case of a blowout.
Environmental groups pounced on the symbolism of the latest spills.
"We have thousands of spills every year. The BP spill just called attention to it, but it's really the Wild West out here," said Anne Rolfes of the Louisiana Bucket Brigade. "There are laws on the books that are unenforced. The record is clear that we don't have the situation under control. It's taken several days to figure out where (the spill west of the river) is coming from, and if we don't have the technology to do that, then we shouldn't be drilling new wells at all."
According to federal government data, several wells in that 3-square-mile block were operated by Anglo-Suisse Offshore Partners LLC. A news release from the former federal Minerals Management Service said in 2006 that five wells in that drilling area had platforms damaged in Hurricane Katrina.
map-oil2-032211.jpgView full size
The state official said the spilling well is one that used to have a platform over it, but lost it during Katrina.
The Coast Guard, meanwhile, still isn't ready to say where the spill originated.
"We don't have any report of it actually being identified," said Coast Guard Petty Officer Steve Leeman.
At a news conference earlier Tuesday, Coast Guard officials said only between ¼- and ½-mile of beach was directly affected by oily material within the 30-mile stretch between Grand Isle and West Timbalier Island where the sheen and emulsified oil has been seen.
Michael Bromwich, director of the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Regulation and Enforcement, told reporters during a break in a conference in New Orleans earlier Tuesday that while officials with is agency had conducted a flyover of the affected area, the Coast Guard was handling the response and "exploring all possibilities."
"I think right now, it remains a mystery," Bromwich said.

By David Hammer, The Times-Picayune

Sunday, March 20, 2011

The Spread of Lionfish in the Atlantic

From: David A Gabel, ENN

Normally, the abundance of a wild species is hailed as a sign of a healthy ecosystem. However, that is not the case for the lionfish, an invasive species which is rapidly multiplying in the waters of the Caribbean, Gulf of Mexico, and the US Eastern Seaboard. According to the US Geological Survey (USGS), it is the first documented case of an invasive species establishing a self-sustaining population in the region. Once confined to the Indo-West Pacific Ocean, lionfish are now spreading throughout the West Atlantic.

"Nothing like this has been seen before in these waters," said Dr. Pam Schofield, a biologist with the USGS Southeast Ecological Science Center here. "We've observed sightings of numerous non-native species, but the extent and speed with which lionfish have spread has been unprecedented; lionfishes pretty much blanketed the Caribbean in three short years."

The lionfish, of the marine fish genus, Pterois, is a venomous fish with fan-shaped pectoral fins and spiky dorsal fins which give the appearance of a lion's mane, hence the name. Their shape and their elaborate color provide the lionfish with excellent camouflage. They can grow to a length of 35 centimeters and can be often found by coral reefs, crevices, or lagoons.

Scientists at the USGS are concerned that the lionfishes’ predatory behavior will negatively impact the native species in the region. They have already been observed preying on and competing with the indigenous species. It is unclear how the lionfish first found their way into the Atlantic. They were first sighted in the mid-1980s off the Atlantic coast of Florida. Since the turn of the century, their numbers have exploded.

Dr. Schofield and her colleagues at USGS are in the Florida Keys, working with Researchers from NOAA and REEF (Reef Environmental Education Foundation) to examine the lionfish diet. They can then determine the impact the fish might have on native reef ecosystems.

Complete eradication of the species is highly unlikely at this point. However, local control efforts might be able to keep their numbers low and ease the pressure exerted on native species. Many Caribbean nations like Bermuda and the Cayman Islands have started their own lionfish control programs. In the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary, REEF efforts have resulted in the removal of over 600 lionfish.

The USGS study has been published in the journal Aquatic Invations.

Link to published article: http://www.aquaticinvasions.net/2010/Supplement/AI_2010_5_S1_Schofield